
Gavin James Bower
In January of this year, my alter ego Madame Arcati ran an interview with the young writer Gavin James Bower for his debut novel Dazed & Aroused. Gavin is a former runway model and his book is set in the world of high fashion and modelling, so you get the drift on theme: but its stylised prose, likened by many critics to that of Bret Easton Ellis, placed it on the literary fringes, well outside the airport WH Smith concentration camps, which suggests more novels to come.
Something in this interview plainly annoyed one publishing editor who has just written in anonymously (as 'ed') to Arcati. The letter has the authentic tone of arrogance and know-all-ness characteristic of many publishing editors, long dead to books except as trophy index and window display. Like so many journalists who cannot write, here we have another editor who cannot read: doubtless extra-literary considerations drew him to the accursed world of books.
First, you may want to acquaint yourself with the interview to make sense of the letter. Or perhaps not. You can piece things together from ed's remarks. The letter (unedited):
'Ok this has gone far enough, someone needs to restore a little perspective here. I work for a major international publisher (in London) who was altered to a number of literary events and talents via a Guardian article and frankly, my time has been wasted.
'Let's start with: Bower and Dazed [Dazed & Confused, the magazine]. I know Rod and Tim at Dazed and they have 52 interns a years [Gavin having been one]. No one could possibly remember a single intern. Why attempt to sell books on this basis. Surely, it's embarrassing. Their commitment to Literature is very low and Jeff Hack is a cash cow - he's been rube to 104+ people since he was rube to you. Why make such a big deal out of the fact that you worked there for a week? It is also very bad form to glorify a magazine that charges £44,000 an advert. This excludes all publishing companies for the sake of hair products and fashion houses.
'Re 'The Publishing Industry': 'Bower. Surely you know that you were published because of your saleability - because the BEE [Bret Easton Ellis] model works. Evaluate your own prose. Place it in a lineage. Have a big old think about yourself.
'When a publisher signs someone like Bower we all sigh and mutter a variant on "how low can you go" to one another. This is a terrible blog and Bower is a bog-standard author. We all flitter around the HTML GIANT chaps, thinking, shall we? Shall we not? And even though these guys are much better than Bower, none of us will touch them, because frankly they're not good enough. This contemporary mode of short-sharp prose, with its confessional sexual misgivings and taboo breaking one-up-manship is so so tired. It's a genre to itself, likeable only to 'heart-break-fang-bash' - Twilight style, the first series of books written to suit supermarket shoppers.
'I saw you at Lit Death Match. Shambles.
'Chin up. Even if you killed yourself now, no one would care.'
ed.

Oooh Matron. (Free Tibet).
ReplyDeleteWhat's Tibet done for us? Think about it.
ReplyDeleteThe 'ed' strikes me as troubled.
ReplyDeleteI doubt that the Ed is a publishing editor. The writer is connected in some way to the magazine.
ReplyDeleteWhat's a HTML GIANT?
ReplyDeleteYou may as well bring back Arcati if you're running shit like this
ReplyDeleteWhat nastiness.
ReplyDeleteI have seen Gavin at two events one on which he chaired a debate with the extremely rude Darcus Howe and did so with grace and at a Literary Death Match in which he in no way a shambles and was in fact graceful in defeat. The latter was not my cup of tea because Shoreditch sends me slightly mental but that my own problem.
I hate beautiful to see young women being punished for their looks and because I am in fact not a bitter sexist hate to see it happen to good-looking young men. I wish Gavin every success.
@Anon 23.28 It isn't shit it is good.
ReplyDeleteThank you Suzanne, and I wholly agree with you. A few people have privately asked me why I put up Ed's shitty little put-down and my answer is simple - because it was there and also because I think it typifies a certain publisher mindset. A great deal of mainstream publishing is now effectively useless, dedicated either to formula or style oneupmanship likely to tickle the broadsheets. Ed - whoever he or she is - might have a happier life as a racing tipster.
ReplyDeleteDid it not occur to you that this ed might possibly not be a publishing editor but a staffer on Dazed & Confused? That's my deduction having read gavin's interview.
ReplyDeleteRube?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous, Madame Arcati would have run the photo of Gavin's cock that he tweeted yesterday, that's the only difference I can see. Or not see.
ReplyDeleteHe tweeted his cock? I fear Arcati's led him astray - she is in a maximum security spa in Israel as I write.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think ed works on a tabloid. They've all gone half crazy now.
ReplyDeleteLike GJB's style. Is it a whopper?
ReplyDeleteFucking wow. You're here.
ReplyDeleteed's dummy spit really is bizarre. Just getting any book on the shelves now should be a celebration for the publishing industry which is facing an uncertain future.
ReplyDeleteWhat a lazy editor making lazy comparisons about lazy comparisons.
ReplyDeleteSmug.
Saw Gavin at Literary Death Match too and he was great.
Plate the cunts Gavin. Ignore and prevail darling. Most reviewers / "editors" review / edit because they can't write.
ReplyDeleteI think you are fabulous. And so does Darling Ma who is in the bottom bunk. Such a pretty place Isrwael, shame about the soldiers with guns patrolling this Dead Sea Spa, but hey.
x
Ed uses a capital L for literature. A sure sign of the unread.
ReplyDeleteEd can't read...or write...and is discriminating against pretty. Haterade consumed in massive quantities.
ReplyDeleteSorry, not smart enough to be a successful racing tipster.
ReplyDeleteBest.......Zombied ex.